Showing posts with label method. Show all posts
Showing posts with label method. Show all posts

Monday, 6 January 2020

Understanding & Responding to the Diverse Nature of Learners - Principle 11


One of the most depressing things that I observe in schools is the tendency to adopt a core and common curriculum taught using a limited set of teaching methods. Even more depressing is the fact that this approach takes no account of varied learning styles, nor does it consider the individual needs, interests and abilities of the children in the classroom.


The use of curriculum and teaching practices that assume all students are the same, and teaching diverse classes a common program with identical expectations, couldn’t be further from what Christian education should be. God made us as unique and diverse creatures, and this wasn’t by accident. Varying abilities and even learning styles weren’t an unfortunate accident of creation.

All students will have different strengths, weaknesses, and needs. Romans 12:3-18 is the place in Scripture we go to when we think of different spiritual gifts. But just as God has given his people varied spiritual gifts, he has also created us with different abilities, strengths, interests, skills, personalities and so on. The diversity evident in any classroom is extraordinary and needs to be accepted and addressed. This will be demonstrated by using varied methods, techniques and strategies for the varied abilities and gifts we will see represented in our classrooms.

"4 For just as each of us has one body with many members, and these members do not all have the same function, so in Christ we, though many, form one body, and each member belongs to all the others. We have different gifts, according to the grace given to each of us. If your gift is prophesying, then prophesy in accordance with your faith; if it is serving, then serve; if it is teaching, then teach; if it is to encourage, then give encouragement; if it is giving, then give generously; if it is to lead, do it diligently; if it is to show mercy, do it cheerfully." (Romans 12:3-8)

 Christian teachers, classrooms, and schools should at least grasp and demonstrate these basic understandings in word and action. We are to do this by responding to, valuing, respecting and building on our children’s varied abilities, skills, needs and gifts. Teaching to the middle, or application of restrictive methods to the point of frustration for some, is not an option that should serve as an appropriate goal or acceptable practice. We are to encourage and help students who are slower to learn, and enrich those students who show specific gifts. We must also develop those who have learning difficulties. God has made our children to be different, hence we need to educate, extend and grow all of our students as learners and people.

Recognising pedagogically that we understand diversity and difference

God delights in us as learners and has given us the ability to learn in varied ways. Learning can occur in formal and informal ways within the family (Deut 6:1–9) and likewise the school. We should use varied methods to accommodate the differences that we observe in our students. The Bible offers many examples of the diverse ways that humans learn, as well as clear and practical examples of how great teachers work. The actions of teachers across the Old and New Testaments demonstrate the varied activities used. These include planning diverse activities that respond to our observations and experiences, a strategy that Jesus used often (e.g. Luke 13:18–21). In other places in Scripture we see how narrative and parables were used to teach (Ezek 17; Luke 8:4–8). On other occasions learning was framed using allegories and metaphor to help learners grasp profound truths (Isa 5:1–7; Ezek 16). Good teachers in the Bible also offered and used first-hand experience to reinforce key learning (Luke 9:1–8; 10:1–20). Learning of course throughout the ages has often occurred within the general activities of life, as discussion and questioning were used by parents and teachers to help children and adults grasp new ideas and concepts (e.g. Luke 24:13–25). The Bible also has many examples of signs and symbolic acts being utilised to bring home significant truths (1 Kgs 11:29–39; Isa 20:1–6).  

In many ways, the above diverse approaches are similar to what the educator would call experience based learning. And of course, direct expository teaching through the spoken and written word is common and needed as well. Do we exercise our freedom to use sound and varied methods that equip our students for the whole of life? This diverse array of models for learning from the Scriptures should encourage us to think broadly about the possibilities for shaping teaching and learning in our classrooms.

In summing up, let me say that experienced teachers know almost intuitively, that just as there are many different and unique learners in every classroom, there are many methods we can use in teaching that match the different types of learners. As I stress often in my book ‘Pedagogy and Education for Life’, and already quite specifically in the 7th Principle, we must never assume that all students are the same. God made us as individuals. No two of us are exactly the same and all have a part to play in God's world (1 Cor 12:27) as well as in any classroom. God also gave each of us different gifts to be used. The Apostle Peter reminds us that each of us “should use whatever gift you have received to serve others, as faithful stewards of God’s grace in its various forms.” (1 Pet 4:10).

Teachers have a great responsibility to use diverse pedagogy to assist learning and teaching. This is to reflect student diversity, and to encourage the diverse gifts and abilities that we see in our students. With such diversity within our students, it should be obvious that diverse methods are needed to help our students to learn and grow into independent and mature learners.

Friday, 28 September 2018

'Indentify that which is Valuable in all Children' - Pedagogical Principle 1

Have you ever considered what drives us as teachers; and by extension, what drives the schools in which we serve? Is our major concern to see our students growth in character? Or are we fixated on growing their minds, or perhaps, just helping them to achieve success at school? Is our major priority (and perhaps that of parents) simply helping students' to succeed at school and hence, in life? What a shallow and inadequate aspiration this is for education!

Every parent of course wants their children to succeed in life, to gain employment, have families and so on. But what of their character? Where does their formation as people fit in? Is it even a concern of the teacher? And what role if any, does the teacher play in partnership with parents in the formation of children?  

In my last post I emphasized that my book ‘Pedagogy and Education for Life: A Christian Reframing of Teaching, Learning, and Formation’ represents a distillation of my many years as a teacher and researcher addressing questions of this type. My experience as a teacher and researcher, as well as my faith, led me over almost three decades, to develop a pedagogy that did not consist simply of knowledge of good practice and appropriate curriculum content. Rather, it has a central assumption that children learn in relationship to others, and that these relationships and the practices they engage in day by day, are always embedded within shared communities, consisting of people who hold many understandings, beliefs and practices. The definition that shaped the pedagogy within my book reflects the culmination (at that time) of my personal life journey as a teacher when I realized that.
“Education is the whole life of a community, and the experience of its members learning to live this life, from the standpoint of a specific goal”
At the end of my last post I shared a pedagogical framework reflecting this definition and promised that I'd begin to discuss each of the 20 components organized around three key main strands of a biblical theology of personhood:
  • God made us as unique creatures
  • God made us as creatures who learn
  • God made us for communion
Each of the above understandings of personhood lead to a number of questions that should shape pedagogy. In this post, I want to comment on the first question that relates to our uniqueness.

Do I identify that which is valuable in each child?

Above: Picasso's Girl with a mandolin
All children are made in the image of God (Gen 2:15-25) and yet, all are different. While we might recognize common behaviour, attitudes, knowledge, habits (good and bad), abilities, emotional strengths or weaknesses and so on, in our children, each child in his or her own way is unique. This is of course is true, even for identical twins (monozygotic twins) who from the same fertilized egg. They too are genetically different (see this article) and different in character.

What does this simple plank in my pedagogy imply for pedagogy? Let me suggest five things.

a) First, that to teach to teach the whole class as a single group is foolishness. Sure, if we wish to teach specific skills and knowledge that we see as vital (e.g. learning to count), it will mean that all will be taught the same content. But if we are to engage students as learners, we will need to find content that varies and relates to diverse interests and adopts varied methods.
b) Second, we should expect our students to present with different strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, we have a responsibility to build on strength and support students to cope with their weaknesses and perhaps overcome them or cope with them. Conversely, we need to have a diverse curriculum that allows students to demonstrate their varied capabilities. As a young difficult child in primary school I was grateful to several teachers who encouraged some of my key interests and tolerated areas of weakness.
c) Third, we should strive to develop curriculum content that opens up many and varied forms of learning. This of course might reflect and relate to curriculum content (science, art, writing, maths, drama, natural history, music etc), or perhaps modes for learning (creative activities, oral and written expression, divergent as well as convergent thinking etc). 
d) Fourth, we should offer choice in content and curriculum activities, not simply prescription.  Enthusiasm can be more easily engendered by ensuring some freedom and choice for students in relation to the activities that are experienced.
e) Fifth, we need to understand that we all have different abilities and capabilities, and ensure that we allow space for this in our curriculum and pedagogical practices.

To be an effective teacher is to recognize that which is unique and valuable in each child.

In my next post, I will consider the second of my 20 principles. This examines the place of the family in God's plan, and the question "Does my class and school build on the foundations of the family"?

Wednesday, 3 January 2018

Is there such a thing as Christian Pedagogy?

In my soon to be released book - 'Pedagogy and Education for Life' (Wipf & Stock) - I explore what a 'Christian' pedagogy might look like. One of my key arguments is that any education claiming to be Christian should be shaped by biblical wisdom and understanding. Christian pedagogy isn't simply a specific methodology, a defined worldview, or unique curriculum content and methods assessed through varied 'Christian' lenses. Instead, I offer a simple definition of what Christian education might be:

Education is the whole of life of a community, and the experience of its members learning to live this life, from the standpoint of a specific end goal.

A central premise of the definition and the book, is that Education is about the “whole of life” of a community, not simply curriculum or method. The students and teachers who are the central participants in any school need to “learn to live this life” together from a particular standpoint. As such, at the very foundation of any Christian pedagogy is not ‘what we should teach?’ or ‘how we should teach it?’, but ‘why we teach?’


The Bible teaches that our lives are to be centered on knowing and honoring God in the here and now, with an eye on the future as we await Christ’s return and the coming of the kingdom of God. Our true and ultimate home is not on Earth. Indeed, we are called to live out our lives as “foreigners” or “aliens and strangers” (1 Pet 1:17b; 2:9–12). We live between two worlds: the current one, and the next to come. This can be a confusing place for children!

If education is the whole of life of a community, and the experience of its members learning to live this life, from the standpoint of a specific end goal, then we have more to consider than curriculum and methods.

 
Avoiding Ends-based Education

One of my common observations of schools (religious and otherwise), is that they offer an education focused on the ends, rather than the means of education. But I argue that ends and means must always be seen in relation to the ultimate problems of life, problems that concern the nature and destiny of humankind. This should lead to a pedagogy that reflects an understanding that God made us in his image as creative, problem-solving beings, to seek him and live in relationship to him and one another. While doing this, God also called us to love, serve, and work with a knowledge of his risen Son in order to bring God glory. Education is a process of cultivation and formation. Put another way, the task of the teacher is the nurturing and transformation of habits of body and mind that enable children to fulfill God’s purposes for their lives centered in Christ.

My book should be out in March or April, but in the meantime, I intend to write a number of posts that will prepare my readers for the arguments that will be outlined in detail in the book.

In future posts I will discuss some of the many topics that I cover. Not all will be as separate posts, but all will be at least introduced:
  • The role of the imagination in education
  • Forming & connecting communities that matter in education 
  • Why the 'whole of life' of any community is what matters
  • Children's worlds: A myriad of competing 'Communities of Practice'
  • Making belief, desires and views of the world are observable and discussible in supportive contexts
  • The place of 'formation' NOT indoctrination: What might it look like?
  • Helping students to engage with their world
  • Helping our students to navigate the world
  • Why does 'standpoint' matter?
  • Understanding why God made us as creative beings
  • The power of story
  • The place of truth and the One who is the author of truth
  • Wholeness, and why it matters
  • A pedagogy that intersects and connects other different worlds
  • Where do values, worldview and virtues fit in?
  • A concern for meaning, understanding, truth & critical thinking
  • Classroom life & the teacher's role within it
  • Storytelling and Life
  • Imagination & Life
  • A framework for Classroom & School Life
 I look forward to engaging with you in future posts.

NEXT Post: 'Learning Occurs Within Communities Not Just Schools'